Ruhi Tanveer Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2023.04.06 15:04:17 +0530 HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV 19.aba398.22.doc Shiv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.398 OF 2022 Nasimuddin Hakimuddin Shaikh & Ors.

...Applicants vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.597 OF 2022 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.398 OF 2022 Ruhi Tanveer Shaikh ...Intervenor In the matter between Nasimuddin Hakimuddin Shaikh & Ors.

...Applicants vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms. Seema S. Singh for the Applicant in ABA No.398/2022. Ms. Sartaj for the first informant/intervenor in IA No.597/2022. Mr. H. J. Dedhia APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM :S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED :3RD APRIL 2023 P. C. :

1.

Learned Advocate for the first informant submitted that her Interim Application for intervention is not yet decided and she seeks time to file written submissions along with the documents. When it 1/2

19.aba398.22.doc is shown to her that she could have saved time by submitting it earlier. It is told that earlier the matter was referred to mediation, however, it is not successful. The report is there on record. 2.

When this Court opined, why this is not filed earlier, learned Advocate for the first informant submitted the documents and written submissions. They are taken on record and marked as Annexure "X". Copy is served on learned APP and learned Advocate for the Applicant.

3.

Interim Application is allowed.

4.

Interim protection to continue till the next date. 5.

Matter be kept on 24th April 2023.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] 2/2