← Library
Bombay High CourtRPW/148/2019disposed off

The Secretary, Planning Dept. And ORS. v. Shri. Murlidhar Sitaram Khirmode Pathan (Ramapur) And ORS.

2019-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.A. Sayed,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

1/2 rpwst-4226-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ...

REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4226 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8908 OF 2015 ...

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Kishor Digambar Gaikwad & Ors.

...Respondents

...

REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4221 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4907 OF 2016 ...

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Rajaram Shyamrao Kokare & Ors.

...Respondents

...

REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 4233 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4906 OF 2016 The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Murlidhar Sitaram Khirmode Pathan (Ramapur) and & Ors.

...Respondents

...

Mr.Bhupesh Samant, AGP, for the Petitioners-State. Mr. Kiran Bapat a/w Mr. Y.B. Lengere i/b Mrs.Suman Lengare for the Respondents.

...

CORAM : A.A. SAYED & NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATED : 25 NOVEMBER 2019 (AT 2.45 P.M. IN CHAMBER) Uday.P.Kambli 1/2

2/2 rpwst-4226-19.doc P.C.:

The order under review, interalia, follows the judgments of the Division Bench of this Court, referred to in paras 6 and 7, wherein the Petitioners therein were directed to be treated as permanent employees with effect from the date of filing of their respective ULPs. The judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.2946 of 1997 has as a matter of fact not been interfered by the Apex Court in the SLP . 2.

In the circumstances, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record to interfere with the order under review. Even otherwise, no case for review is made out.

3.

The Review Petitions are dismissed.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) Uday.P.Kambli 2/2