Dinesh N.Kotecha And ORS. v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2211 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1493 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2211 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 738 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2211 OF 2005 M/s. K.k. Associates Petitioners V/s.

Mohanlal Dhanji Powani And Ors.

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4034 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 451 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 739 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4034 OF 2005 Dinesh N.kotecha And Ors.

Petitioners V/s.

State Of Maharashtra And Ors.

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4624 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 737 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4624 OF 2005 Kiran Kawre 1/3

Dharamshi Bhavanji Ruparel And Ors.

Petitioners V/s.

Mohanlal Damaji Pawani And Ors.

Respondents ----- None for the Petitioner.

Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. a/w Mr. S. H. Kankal, AGP for the Respondent/State. ----- C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024 PC :

1.

Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court. No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.

Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the Kiran Kawre 2/3

petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.

4.

Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

5.

Civil Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Kiran Kawre 3/3