Sushil Kumar Saxena v. Mohammad Sami Ahmed And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.684 OF 2017 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA )...PETITIONER

VERSUS

MOHAMMAD SAMI AND ANOTHER )...RESPONDENTS None for the petitioner.

Mr.R.M.Pethe, APP for the Respondent-State.

Mr.Pankaj Thatte,Advocate a/w Sucheta Joshi Dongre for Respondent No.1.

CORAM

:

A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE :25TH FEBRUARY 2020 P.C. :

1.

None for the petitioner when the petition is called out for hearing. Respondent No.1 appears through his counsel. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears for the State.

Chitra Sonawane 1/2

2.

It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) Chitra Sonawane 2/2