Mukhtar Tayyab Kazi v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 19-appa.243.2017.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.140 OF 2017 (THROUGH JAIL) Mukhtar Tayyab Kazi ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Prosper D'Souza, Advocate appointed for the Applicant. Ms.G.P.Mulekar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY, 2017 P.C. :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay caused in filing the appeal against conviction and sentence. 3.

In view of averments made in the application and looking to the fact that the appeal is filed through jail, we are of

2/2 19-appa.243.2017.doc the opinion that in the interest of justice delay ought to be condoned.

4.

Accordingly, delay is condoned. Application is allowed in above terms.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)