M/S. Aditya Enterprises Through Prop. Adity Tejas Patel v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

24.APPR-103.17.doc sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.103 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION(ST)NO.110 OF 2017 Aditya Tejas Patel, Proprietor M/s. Aditya Enterprises ... Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil for the Applicant.

Ms. N.S.Jain, APP, for the Respondent-State.

Mr. Girish Parjani for the Respondent no.2. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J.

DATE : 29 th JUNE, 2017 P.C.

1. This application seeks condonation of delay in filing the revision application. The learned counsel for respondent no.2 appears on notice and undertakes to enter appearance within a week from today. In the meantime, he has no objection if the present application is heard. The application sets out the reasons for the delay in paragraph 3. The application is opposed on behalf of respondent no.2.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the delay has been sufficiently explained and the delay is liable to be condoned. In the circumstances, I pass the following order:- 1/2

24.APPR-103.17.doc (i) Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ii) Office objection, if any, shall be removed within a period of one week from the date of uploading of this order.

Stand over to 13 th July, 2017.

(A. K. MENON, J.) 2/2