Archie Creado v. Michael Fernandes

ANANT KRISHNA NAIK ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date: 2024.02.16 17:05:50 +0530 1/2 28.CAC.207.2019_.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 207 OF 2019 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 4383 OF 2019 Archie Creado ...Applicant

Versus

Michael Fernandes

...Respondent

Aileen S. Marques i/b. Mr. Anthony Morques for the Applicant. None for the Respondent CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J.

DATED : 14th FEBRUARY, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant. This is an Application for condonation of delay of 20 days in filing the above Revision Application.

2.

The sole Respondent is duly served and is represented by the lawyer, whose name appeared on the board. Office note shows that Affidavit-in-Reply is also filed. But when the matter is called out, none appeared for the Respondent.

3.

Considering the extent of delay and averments in the Application, specially paragraph no. 3 thereof, sufficient cause is made akn 1/2

2/2 28.CAC.207.2019_.doc out. The Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay is condoned.

(M. M. SATHAYE, J.) akn 2/2