Raymond Limited (Erstwhile Raymond Woolen Mills Limited) v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Urban Development Dept And ORS

1 / 2 06-WP-1634-13.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1634 OF 2013 Raymond Limited (Erstwhile Raymond Woolen Mills Limited) .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra through Urban Development Dept & Ors.

.... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2291 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1634 OF 2013 Pratap Sarnaik .... Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Raymond Limited (Erstwhile Raymond Woolen Mills Limited) .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra through Urban Development Dept & Ors.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co., Advocate for Petitioner in Petition and for Applicant in IA. • Mr. R. S. Apte, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. N. R. Bubna, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 with Ms. Pooja R. Singh. • Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. G. P. for State. Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2022.06.29 18:06:59 +0530 MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Nesarikar

2 / 2 06-WP-1634-13.odt CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA & M. G. SEWLIKAR, JJ.

DATE : 27th JUNE, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar, learned Senior Advocate for Petitioner, seeks liberty to withdraw this Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition on future date including on similar cause of action, if required, if for any reason it is not permitted or is prevented to develop the land in question.

2.

Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceeding permissible in law in future including on similar cause of action, if required, if for any reason it is not permitted or is prevented to develop the said land. 3.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any view on merit of the Petition.

4.

Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. (M. G. SEWLIKAR, J.) (R. D. DHANUKA , J.)