← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/441/2021disposed off

Junaid Salim Chawdhary v. Mr. Taufiq Ahmed Khan And ANR.

2022-03-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde2 pages

(19)-AO-441-2021.doc 09.03.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No. 441 / 2021 Junaid Salim Chawdhary ... Appellant

Versus

Mr. Taufiq Ahmed Khan and Anr.

... Respondents **** Mr. Banerjee i/by Naved Salim Chawdhary, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. Ramesh D. Kamble, Advocate for the Respondents. **** CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 9 th MARCH, 2022.

P.C.

Heard.

1.

Appellant-Plaintiff, instituted a Suit No.2947/2019 under Section 6 of the Specific Reliefs Act, 1963. Pending suit, he moved an application, seeking temporary mandatory order. The learned trial Court declined that relief vide order dated 5 th February, 2022. That order is under challenge in this appeal under Order-43 Rule-1 read with Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Najeeb 1/2

(19)-AO-441-2021.doc 09.03.2022 2.

Pending appeal, the parties have filed the affidavit in lieu of evidence. As such, the trial has commenced. In consideration of these facts, I refrain myself from deciding this appeal on merits. Instead I deem it proper to request the trial Court, conclude the trial in Suit No. 2947/2019 preferably on or before 31 st December, 2022.

3.

All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open. 4.

Appeal from order is disposed of.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) by MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Date:

2022.03.09 18:11:00 +0530 MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Najeeb 2/2