Chandrahas Madhavrao Phalke v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

rsk 1/2 9-1-2-APPN-1089-146-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1089 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1845 OF 2017 Rahul Ramesh Kumbhar & Ors.

..Applicant-Intervenors In the matter between Neelesh Dipak Naik & Anr.

...Applicants vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.146 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1845 OF 2017 Chandrahas Madhavrao Phalke ..Applicant-Intervenor In the matter between Neelesh Dipak Naik & Anr.

...Applicants vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

---- Mr.Aniket U. Nikam i/b Mr. Aashish Satpute for Applicants. Mr. Sandeep M. Phatak for Intervenor Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent.

---- CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 16th APRIL, 2018 P.C.:

.

Issue notice. Learned APP waives service for Respondent-State. 2.

The applications are filed for intervention by investors who are named by complainant in the complaint and who had invested in a project

rsk 2/2 9-1-2-APPN-1089-146-18.doc initiated by applicant being construction of 15 row houses, for which initial booking was made. It is therefore submitted that applicants are necessary parties to be heard while considering anticipatory bail application of applicant.

3.

For the grounds mentioned in the applications and facts as aforesaid applications are allowed. As such applicants-investors are allowed to assist the prosecution. Both applications are disposed of as allowed. (P.N. DESHMUKH, J)