← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/107/2016rule absolute

The State Of Maharashtra v. Anil Shripati Raybole

2019-03-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka1 pages

ssm 1 6-appln107.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 107 OF 2016 State of Maharashtra .....Applicant Vs.

Anil Shripati Raybole ....Respondent.

Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Applicant-State. None for the Respondent.

CORAM : A. S. OKA, AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 7th MARCH, 2019.

P.C.:- As per the Affidavit of service filed by the concerned Police Officer, notice has been served to the Respondent. None appears for the Respondent.

Heard the learned APP for the Applicant-State. A sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 17 days. Hence, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S. GADKARI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) 1/1