Bombay High CourtAPPLN/107/2016rule absolute
The State Of Maharashtra v. Anil Shripati Raybole
2019-03-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka1 pages
ssm 1 6-appln107.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 107 OF 2016 State of Maharashtra .....Applicant Vs.
Anil Shripati Raybole ....Respondent.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Applicant-State. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATE : 7th MARCH, 2019.
P.C.:- As per the Affidavit of service filed by the concerned Police Officer, notice has been served to the Respondent. None appears for the Respondent.
Heard the learned APP for the Applicant-State. A sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 17 days. Hence, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S. GADKARI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) 1/1