← Library
Bombay High CourtARP/102/2023disposed off

Prasad Toke v. Sonoma Management Partners Private Limited

2023-02-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale2 pages

903.ARP.102.2023.doc by SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI Date:

2023.02.17 15:46:14 +0530 SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION 102 OF 2023 Prasad Toke & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd.

...Respondent

***  Mr. Hiral Thakkar i/by Sarthak P. Shetty, for the Petitioners.  Mr. Shreyas Deshpande, for Respondent.

*** CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2023.

P. C. :

1.

This petition is listed in the backdrop of the fact that the learned Arbitrator appointed by an order dated 03rd January, 2023 has recused from the matter. The learned Arbitrator was appointed on the joint request by the parties.

2.

In this earlier, learned Counsel for the parties make a joint request for appointment of an Advocate Shanay Shah, as a substitute Arbitrator.

3.

In view of the commercial expression on behalf of the parties, Advocate Shanay Shah is appointed as a sole Arbitrator. The details of the learned Arbitrator are as follows : Mr. Shanay Shah, Chambers of Rohaan Cama, Islam Building, 1st Floor, 461, V. N. Road, Shrikant

903.ARP.102.2023.doc Opp. Akbarallys, Flora Fountain, Mumbai - 400 023. Mob. No. 9987483450.

4.

The learned Arbitrator shall communicate his consent and Disclosure Statement under Section 11(8) r/w 12(1) of the aforesaid Act, within a period of four weeks to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

5.

The Fees of the learned Arbitrator shall be as per Schedule IV to the aforesaid Act.

6.

The rest of the contents of the order dated 03rd January, 2023, shall continue to operate.

7.

It is recorded that the parties have agreed for the place of Arbitration shall be Mumbai.

(MANISH PITALE, J.) Shrikant