Sayed Ahmed Husain Through Poa Holder M.K. Ismail v. Union Of India And Others

Trupti 209-cra-660-09.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 173 OF 2016 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 660 OF 2009 Sayed Ahmed Hussain ...Applicant

Versus

Union of India & Ors.

...Respondents

......

Mr.Arif Bookwala, Senior Advocate i/b. M/s. S.V.Pikale & Co. for the Applicant.

......

CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATED:

JULY 06, 2017 P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has taken out the application for amendment in Civil Revision Application No. 660 of 2009 and the amendment to the effect of production of some documents i.e. rent receipts are remained to be produced before the City Civil Court. He also produces Draft Amendment where he raises a question of law.

2.

The application for amendment is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment is to be carried out within a period of two weeks and the amendment copy of Civil Revision Application No. 660 of 2009 is to be served on the respondents within a period of two weeks thereafter.

Trupti 209-cra-660-09.doc 3.

The applicant is allowed to take out another Civil Application whereby he raises a question of law. However, the Draft Amendment is different from the amendment, which is sought in Civil Application No. 173 of 2016 and therefore, it will be proper for the applicant to take out a separate Civil Application for disclosing the Draft Amendment. Liberty is granted. In between, the applicant is allowed to take steps in respect of intended amendment. The draft amendment is taken on record and marked as 'X'.

4.

In view of the above, stand over to 03.08.2017. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)