Pinni Sahakari Griharachana Sanstha Maryadit v. Shri. Dattu Fakira Gaikwad And ORS

CRA404&group.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.404 OF 2013 Pinni Sahakari Griharachana Sanstha Maryadit ... Applicants Vs.

Kamlabai Rupchand Gagade and others ...

Respondents WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.639 OF 2012 Pinni Sahakari Griharachana Sanstha Maryadit ... Applicants Vs.

Dattu Fakira Gaikwad and others ...

Respondents WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.438 OF 2013 Pinni Sahakari Griharachana Sanstha Maryadit ... Applicants Vs.

Gulab Shettiba Pawar and others ...

Respondents WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.431 OF 2013 Pinni Sahakari Griharachana Sanstha Maryadit ... Applicants Vs.

Shankar Dhagu Gaikwad and others ...

Respondents WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.270 OF 2013 Pinni Sahakari Griharachana Sanstha Maryadit ... Applicants Vs.

Sitabai Sukya Kale and others ...

Respondents Mr. Viraj Kasle i/b. Ram & Co. for Applicants in all the Applications. Mr. Kayval P. Shah i/b. Mr. P. B. Shah for Respondents No.1 to 4 in CRA 404 of 2013 and Respondents No.1, 5, 8, 9 and 11 in CRA 639 of 2012. 1/2

CRA404&group.sxw Mr. Shailesh Chavan i/b. Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Respondent No.1 in CRA 270 of 2013.

CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2015 P.C. :

Heard Mr. Kasle, learned Counsel for applicants in all the Applications, Mr. Shah for respondents No.1 to 4 in C.R.A.No.404 of 2013 and respondents No.1, 5, 8, 9 and 11 in C.R.A.No.639 of 2012 as also Mr. Chavan for respondent No.1 in C.R.A.No.270 of 2013. 2.

Mr. Kasle, upon taking telephonic instructions from the applicants, seeks permission to withdraw these Applications on the ground that parties have filed compromise terms in the trial Court. Mr. Shah and Mr. Chavan have no objection.

3.

Hence, on the motion made by Mr. Kasle, Applications are allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. Civil Revision Applications are disposed of.

(R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab 2/2