Bapusingh Ditiya Singod v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 902-ba.338.2016.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.338 OF 2016 (THROUGH JAIL) Bapusingh Ditiya Singod ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

None for the Applicant.

Ms.G.P.Mulekar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State API - J.S.Nale, Boisar Police Station.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.

DATE : 21st MARCH, 2017 P.C. :

1.

None was present for the applicant when the matter was called out in the morning session. None appears even at the second call.

2.

This is the second bail application preferred by the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected on merits by this Court (Coram:Revati Mohite Dere,J.)

2/2 902-ba.338.2016.doc vide order dated 19th March, 2015, passed in Bail Application No.1598 of 2014.

3.

Learned APP on the instructions of the officer who is present in the Court states that trial of the applicant has commenced and that five witnesses in the said case have already been examined and seven more witnesses are to be examined in the said case. The said statement is accepted. 4.

Considering the fact, that the trial has already commenced, no interference is warranted.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

6.

Registry to communicate the above order to the applicant, who is lodged in Thane Central Prison, Thane. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)