The State Of Maharashtra v. Mohamad Akram M. Yusuf Mukhari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.829 OF 2002 IN L.A.R. NO.105 OF 1991 ALONG WITH CROSS OBJECTIONS (L) NO.20679 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra.

..

Appellant

Versus

Mahamad Akaram M. Yusuf Mukhari.

..

Respondent -- Shri S.K. Shinde, Government Pleader for the Appellant. Shri S.M. Kamble for the Respondent.

-- CORAM :

A.S.OKA, J (HEAD OF THE PANEL) S.S.DESHMUKH, RETIRED DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, MEMBER AND M.S GUPTA, REGISTRAR, MEMBER DATED :

8TH APRIL 2017 P.C.

1.

The consent terms duly singed by the learned Government Pleader appearing for the Appellant, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents, Shri Dattaprasad D. Nade, the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Metro Center No.1, Panvel, as well as Shri Asif A. Nachan,

the Respondent No.2 and Shaarif A. Nachan, the Respondent No.4, who are present in the Court, are taken on record and marked "X1" for identification. Shri Kamble, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents on instructions of both the Respondents who are present in the Court, states that both the Respondent Nos.2 and 4 have signed the consent terms on behalf of all the Respondents and that the remaining Respondents will either personally visit the office of this Court and sign the consent terms or will produce a signed copy of the consent terms duly countersigned by the learned counsel himself. He states that this exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from today. We accept the statements. Permission is accordingly granted to sign the consent terms.

2.

The Appeal and the Cross Objections are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Accordingly, the award shall be drawn in terms of the consent terms in accordance with Section 21 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987.

3.

Before issuing writ of this Court, the Registrar (Judicial-II) shall verify whether the consent terms are signed by the rest of the Respondents in terms of Paragraph 2 above. Writ shall be issued only if deficit Court fee, if any, on the Cross Objections is paid within a period of four weeks from today.

4.

If the Respondent-Claimant has furnished a bank guarantee, the Reference Court on production of a certified copy of the Judgment and Award or on receipt of the writ of this Court, shall pass a formal order of discharge of bank guarantee and return the same to the Respondent-Claimant.

5.

In case of non-compliance by the Government of Maharashtra with the award made by the Lok Adalat, the parties are free to approach the Court for seeking its implementation. 6.

The pending Civil Application does not survive and the same is disposed of.

(A.S. OKA, J) HEAD OF THE PANEL ( S. S. DESHMUKH) MEMBER ( M.S. GUPTA) MEMBER