Uday Nandlala Aggarwal And ANR v. Miss. Neha Uday Aggarwal And ANR

1-caa-339-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.573 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.339 OF 2018 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.573 OF 2014 Uday Nandlala Aggarwal & Another ..

Applicants.

v/s.

Miss Neha Uday Aggarwal & Another ..

Respondents.

Ms. Racheeta R. Dhuru with Amruta Athavale, for the Applicants. Mr. Mikhail Dey i/b. Dinesh Tiwari, for Respondent No.1. Digitally signed by SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI Date:

2022.10.19 14:29:08 +0530 SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK,J.

DATE :- 17th OCTOBER, 2022.

P. C.:

Learned Counsel for the Applicants points out that, consent terms have been filed in the collateral proceedings being Criminal Writ Petition No.3447 of 2022 filed between the same parties. Learned Counsel for the Applicants seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal from Order. In this view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in the present Appeal from Order. Appeal from Order is allowed to be withdrawn. Nothing survives for consideration in the civil application and is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

S. R. Joshi 1/2

1-caa-339-2018.doc Applicant No.1 - Uday Nandlalal Aggarwal is personally present and is identified by learned Counsel for the Applicants. He says that consent terms have been duly filed and has instructed his lawyer to withdraw the Appeal from Order.

Refund of Court fees, if any, as per law.

(M.S.KARNIK, J. ) S. R. Joshi 2/2