Namdeo Mahadeo Pawar And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 48 WP 793 -16.doc Sequeira

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 793 of 2016 Namdeo Mahadeo Pawar and others ... Petitioners Vs The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents Geetanjali Koli i/b Vijay Killedar, for Petitioners. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for Respondent-State.

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

Date : 19th December, 2018.

P.C. :

Learned counsel for Petitioners states that Respondent No.2-Complainant and her husband have settled matrimonial dispute and are residing together. She is seeking time so that both could appear before this Court.

2.

Petitioners before this Court are inlaws i.e. relatives of husband. Husband himself is not Petitioner. 3.

In this situation without recording any finding we accept the statement made. As the purpose of filing present Petition does not survive, we accordingly dispose of Petition as infructuous. (Sarang V.Kotwal, J.) (B.P.Dharmadhikari, J.)