Rameshwar Prasad Ramdular Rajak @ Kanojia v. Vijay Shankar Joshi

1 CRA 235-14.doc-P-4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.235 OF 2014 Rameshwar Prasad Ramdular Rajak @ Kanojia.] ... Applicant

Versus

Vijay Shankar Joshi.

] ... Respondent Ms. Reena Salunkhe for Applicant.

Mr. K. K. Jadhav for Respondent.

CORAM :- M. S. SONAK, J.

DATE :- JULY 29, 2015 P. C. :- 1.

The learned Counsel for parties hand in Consent Terms which are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Consent Terms have been signed by the parties and their respective Counsel. The Applicant is present along with his grandson. There is an endorsement that the grandson of the Applicant has explained and interpreted the scope and import of the Consent Terms in Hindi to the Applicant. The Respondent who is present in Court, also confirms signing of the Consent Terms after having understood the scope and import of the same.

URS

2 CRA 235-14.doc-P-4 2.

The Applicant confirms receipt of Pay Order in respect of the amount stated in Clause 2 of the Consent Terms. The undertakings are accepted.

3.

There shall be an order in terms of the Consent Terms marked 'X'. Civil Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (M. S. SONAK, J.) URS