Sachin Chandrakant Dangat v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

26 wp 780.17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 780 OF 2017 Sachin Chandrakant Dangat ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

..Respondents Mr. P. G. Sarda, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J J.

DATE : 6th MARCH, 2017.

P. C. :

Mr. Sarda, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the petitioner has surrendered after expiry of the parole period. The petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.

2.

However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply before the competent authority for emergency parole if it is permissible in law. [SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1