Mahesh Sanath Yadav v. The State Of Maharashtra

Tilak 1/2 (Pro.3)ABA-349-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.349 OF 2016 Mahesh Sanath Yadav .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent --- Mr.Arun Rajput i/b Mrs.Anjali Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Ms.S.S.Kaushik, APP for the Respondent State. PSI Kadam present.

--- CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 13th JUNE 2016 --- P.C. :

Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The applicant involved in Crime No.306/15 registered by D.B. Marg Police Station on 19th November 2015 for the offence punishable under section 370(3) r/w section 34 IPC and sections 3, 4, 5, 7 (1)(B) of the Prevention of Immoral Trafficking Act (for short 'the PITA Act"), has sought an Anticipatory Bail. The record reveals that applicant is protected by interim bail vide order passed by this Court on 24th February 2016. Learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that custodial

Tilak 2/2 (Pro.3)ABA-349-16 interrogation of the applicant is not necessary, and since investigation is almost complete, charge-sheet is likely to be filed within a short time.

Having considering the facts, as aforesaid, application is allowed.

Interim bail granted to the applicant on 24th February 2016 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. Application is disposed of accordingly.

(P.N. DESHMUKH, J)