Vinay Kumar D. Singh v. State Of Maharashtra Through Ministry Of Law And Judiciary And ORS

* 1/2 * 902-WP-61998-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6198 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2200 OF 2016 Vijay Kumar D. Singh ....Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondents Mr. Rakesh Agarwal, Advocate for Petitioner/Applicant. Mrs. Rupali M. Shinde, AGP for the Respondent No.1-State. Mr. R.J.Singh I/by Ms. R.J.Singh & Co., Advocate for Respondent NO.8.

****** CORAM :- CORAM :- B.R.GAVAI & B.R.GAVAI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 23RD NOVEMBER, 2017.

23RD NOVEMBER, 2017.

P.C. :- P.C. :- The learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to take recourse to alternate remedy available in law. Leave granted. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, taking into consideration interim protection is available for a period of more than one year, the same shall continue to operate for a further period of two weeks from today. Shivgan

* 2/2 * 902-WP-61998-2016.doc We clarify that continuation of ad-interim protection shall not be construed as it is being continued as finding on the merits of submission but it is continued only because co-ordinate bench of this Court has granted relief prior to one year. As the Writ Petition itself is disposed of, nothing survives in the Civil Application therein and the same is also disposed of.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (B.R.GAVAI, J) (B.R.GAVAI, J) Shivgan