← Library
Bombay High CourtFCA/85/2009abated

Renuka N.Gorade Alias Mrs. Renuka Ramakant Suryavanshi v. Ramakant Maruti Suryavanshi

2017-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.K. Tahilramani2 pages

jdk 1 13.fca.85.09.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 85 OF 2009 IN PETITION NO. A-1470 OF 2004 Mrs. Renuka N. Gorade alias Renuka Ramakant Suryawanshi .. Appellant Vs.

Mr. Ramakant M. Suryawanshi & Anr. .. Respondents ....

Mr. Shashank Thatte & Suchita S. Thatte Advocate for Appellant Dr. Santosh Raje Advocate for Intervenor Mr. Tejas H. Bhatt Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

DATED : OCTOBER 11, 2017 ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] :

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant - wife has preferred this Family Court Appeal against the order of the Family Court No.4 Bandra, Mumbai passed in Petition No. A-1470 of 2004 filed by the husband. In the said petition, the husband has sought divorce on the ground of cruelty as well as adultery. The said petition came to be

jdk 2 13.fca.85.09.doc allowed and the Family Court granted divorce to the petitioner - husband. This order has been challenged by the appellant by way of the present Family Court Appeal.

It is brought to our notice that the respondent no.1 who was the husband of the appellant, has expired on 5.7.2016. It is also not controverted by the appellant that the respondent no.1 - husband has expired, however, according to the appellant, the appeal would still survive. The copy of the death certificate is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. In view of the death of the respondent no.1 - husband of the appellant, the Family Court Appeal is disposed of as abated.

[ M.S.KARNIK, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ] kandarkar