Bombay High CourtWP/2411/2017rule made absolute

Rajaram Dattatraya Jadhav And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2017-03-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.2 pages

wp-2411.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2411 OF 2017 1] Rajaram Dattatraya Jadhav ] ] 2] Santosh Kashinath Daundkar ] ] Both Adults, Occupation : Agriculturist ] Both R/at. Dahiwadi, Tal : Shirur ] Dist. Pune ]..... Petitioners.

Versus

1] The State of Maharashtra ] Through the Hon'ble Minister for ] Co-operation Marketing and Textile ] Mantralaya, Mumbai ] ] 2] District Deputy Registrar, ] Cop. Societies, Pune Rural ] At 5, B.J.Road, Maharashtra Rajya ] Sahakari Sangh, Building, Pune-1 ] ] 3] Asst. Registrar, ] Co-op. Societies, Shirur, ] Tal. Shirur, Dist. Pune ] ] 4] Divisional Joint Registrar, ] Co-op. Societies, Pune Rural ] Pune Division, Pune, ] At Sakhar Sankul, Shivaji Nagar, ] Pune - 5 ] ] 5] Proposed Pandit Dindayal Upadhyay ] Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Sanstha ] Maryadit, Dahiwadi, ] Taluka Shirur, District Pune ] Through its Chief Promoter ] Mr. Rajendra Ramdas Dhamdhere ] Age Adult, Occupation : Agriculture ] At and Post Dahiwadi, Taluka Shirur ] Dist. Pune ]..... Respondents.

lgc

wp-2411.17 Shri P S Dani, Senior Advocate i/by Shri S S Kanetkar for the Petitioners Shri. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Shri. A. B. Vagyani, Government Pleader a/w Mrs. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for State/Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Shri. S. K. Shinde a/w Shri. P. H. Gaikwad for Respondent No.5. CORAM :

R. M. SAVANT, J.

Reserved on :

3rd March 2017 Pronounced on : 22nd March 2017 ORAL ORDER :

Rule.

The above Writ Petition is companion to Writ Petition No.1164 of 2017.

In view of the Judgment bearing today's date i.e. 22/03/2017 rendered in the said Writ Petition No.1164 of 2017, and for the reasons stated therein, the above Writ Petition is allowed and the directions as contained in paragraph No.27 of the said Judgment would equally apply to the instant case. The registration of the Society in question as directed by the impugned order would accordingly stand set aside. Rule is accordingly made absolute with parties to bear their respective costs.

[R.M.SAVANT, J] lgc