Vitthal Baban Nakade v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 20.364.16 ba

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 364 OF 2016 Vitthal Baban Nakade .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 224 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 364 OF 2016 Shailesh Babulal Shah Through Power of Attorney ....Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Vitthal Baban Nakade .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent None for Applicant.

Mr. Sayaji D. Nangre for Intervener Mr. R. M. Pethe APP for the State.

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 1, 2016.

PC :

1) None present for the Applicant. The learned APP, on the basis of report, submits that trial has commenced and the learned Magistrate has recorded the ism

2 20.364.16 ba substantive evidence i.e. examination-in-chief of almost two witnesses. Hence, it would not be appropriate to consider the prayer for grant of bail in the midst of trial.

2) Hence, Application stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 3) Intervention application is heard, allowed and disposed of. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) ism