Alok Sharma And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Nalawade A.S.

1 /1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 822 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 823 OF 2016 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 824 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Manish Bohra i/by M/s. A. S. Khan and Associates for the Petitioners. Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP. for the State.

CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

DATE :

3rd May, 2016 P.C.

The petitioners are having substantive alternate remedy by way of revision before the Sessions Court, to challenge the impugned order. In view of the parameters and guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Shalini S. Shetty vs. Rajendra S. Patil reported in (2010) 8 SCC 329, the present petition is not maintainable. In view of the same, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to adopt the appropriate remedy. Leave and liberty granted. Petitions are disposed off as withdrawn.

(A.S. GADKARI, J.)