Shri. Kisan Shivram Mohite And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11917 OF 2015 Shri Bhimrao Kisan Buchade
...Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 174 OF 2016 Shri Balasaheb Vitthal Bendre WRIT PETITION NO. 181 OF 2016 Shri Maruti Kashinath Hulavale
...Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 2460 OF 2016 Shri. Kisan Shivram Mohite And Ors.
...Petitioners
1/6
WRIT PETITION NO. 2474 OF 2016 Shri Baban Dhondiba Bhintade Through His POA Holder Shri. Bhimaji S. Jambhulkar WRIT PETITION NO. 2484 OF 2016 Shri Umesh Digambar Jambhulkar Writ Petition NO. 11918 OF 2015 Shri Dattatray Shankar Buchade WRIT PETITION NO. 11919 OF 2015 Shri Chindhu Damu Buchade WRIT PETITION NO. 11920 OF 2015 Shri Sunil Arjun Jagtap The State Of Maharashtra And Ors .
..Respondents 2/6
WRIT PETITION NO. 11921 OF 2015 Shri Prakash Haribhau Buchade WRIT PETITION NO. 11922 OF 2015 Shri Sukhdeo Sahadu Buchade WRIT PETITION NO. 11923 OF 2015 Shri Vasant Dattatray Sakhare WRIT PETITION NO. 11924 OF 2015 Shri Baburao Govind Buchade WRIT PETITION NO. 11938 OF 2015 Shri Rajaram Maruti Buchade 3/6
WRIT PETITION NO. 11946 OF 2015 Shri Prabhakar Dagadu Buchade WRIT PETITION NO. 12759 OF 2015 Shri Bhausaheb Haribhau Bendre WRIT PETITION NO. 12769 OF 2015 Shri Goraksh Baban Hulavale And Anr.
...Petitioners
WRIT PETITION NO. 4402 OF 2016 Anusaya Bhosale Mr.Suresh M.Sabrad, for the Petitioners.
Mr.P. P. Kakade, AGP for State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 27th APRIL, 2016 4/6
P.C. :
.
The petitioners by these Petitions have challenged the acquisition proceedings which were initiated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer.
2.
The grievance of the petitioners is that though the acquisition proceedings had lapsed, the entries made in the Revenue record reserving the land for project affected persons have not been deleted. The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) No.22, Pune has filed affidavit in reply. He has stated in the reply that since the acquisition proceedings initiated by respondent No.3 could not be completed, the same have lapsed. In view of this affidavit in reply, there is no manner of doubt that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the said land have lapsed and a formal notification to that effect is remained to be issued. We, therefore, direct respondent No.2 to direct his officials to delete the entries of reservation from the Revenue record of 5/6
the land owned by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of 6 weeks from today. The Petitions are accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (V. M. KANADE, J.) 6/6