Sudarshan V. Rang v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

V.A. Tikam 211- APL 229 of 2013.doc VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2023.12.08 11:14:46 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 229 OF 2013 Shri Sudarshan V. Rang .. Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents Mr. Rishabh D. Singh for Applicant Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganpathy, APP for the State -Respondent No.1 Ms. Purnima Kantharia a/w. Madhuri More for Respondent No.2 CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATE : 30th NOVEMBER, 2023.

P. C.:- 1) The trial Court has already framed charge by its Order dated 17th January, 2013 i.e. prior to filing of the present Application and the said Order of framing of charge is not challenged by the Applicant. 2) Learned Advocate for the Applicant therefore seeks leave to withdraw the Application with liberty to challenge the Order dated 17th January, 2013, thereby framing charge in the present case.

Leave granted.

3) Liberty is granted subject to the maintainability of such an Application under the provisions of law, including the limitation thereof. 4) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1