← Library
Bombay High CourtPIL/139/2018dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Parshuram Balaram Patil And ANR v. City And Industrial Development Corporation (Maharashtra) Ltd, Through Managing Director And ORS

2018-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar1 pages

24-pilst-5990-2014.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.5990 OF 2014 Parshuram Balaram Patil and Anr.

...Petitioners

vs.

City and Industrial Development Corporation (Maharashtra) Limited and Ors.

...Respondents

None for the Petitioners Mr. B.B. Sharma, for Respondent No. 1.

Ms. Rekha Panchal, for Respondent No. 4 Ms. Reena Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE :

SEPTEMBER 03, 2018 P.C.:

.

None for the Petitioners.

2.

It has been stated by learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 that the Petitioners' real brother had approached to the Green Tribunal for redressal of their grievances by filing Application No. 35 of 2014 and as such when the issue is pending/ decided at the instance of the Petitioners' real brother, there is no need to invoke jurisdiction of this Court in this Public Interest Litigation.

3.

Be that as it may, keeping in view the fact that the Petitioners are not present, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 1/1