Akbar Kazi v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1/2 wp839.15.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 839 OF 2015 Akbar Kazi ...

Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...

Respondents Mr. Nitin B. Patil for the petitioner.

Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State.

Mr. Fairoza Patel for respondent no.3.

Mr. I.G. Buddhadev, advocate for the Intervenor. CORAM :

NARESH H. PATIL AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

22nd July, 2016.

P.C.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The affidavit is filed by Mr. Arun Naidu and Mr. Prashant Vasant Nikam. Learned Counsel appearing for Arun Naidu and Prashant Vasant Nikam are raising dispute about the settlement. Learned Counsel submit that their clients were misled. They are not inclined now to go ahead with

2/2 wp839.15.sxw the settlement. In view of the conflicting opinion placed on record, we are not inclined to exercise our extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Petition is disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) L.S. Panjwani, P.S.