Sameer Firoz Shaikh @ Badda v. The State Of Maharashtra

918.appp172.17.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 172 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2058 OF 2016 Sameer Firoz Shaikh @ Badda.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Aniket Vagal, advocate for Applicant.

Mr. M.G. Patils, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : MARCH 9, 2017 P.C.:

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the pursuant to the order dated 13/1/2017, the applicant has furnished bail to the tune of Rs. 25,000/- with two solvent sureties. One of the surety for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- has been accepted. However, the second surety for a sum of Rs. 15,000/- and he needs to furnish another surety for a sum of Rs. 15,000/-. The learned Counsel for the applicant prays that in lieu of this, the applicant be directed to be enlarged on provisional Talwalkar 1/2

918.appp172.17.sxw cash bail of Rs. 25,000/- for a period of four weeks from the date of release.

In the circumstances, the relief as prayed for is granted. The applicant be enlarged on provisional cash of Rs. 25,000/- for a period of four weeks from the date of his release. During the said period, the applicant shall furnish local solvent sureties. The application is disposed of accordingly.

The parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) Talwalkar 2/2