Nalini Kamlakar Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

SATISH SANGAR 1 12-APEAL-307-2006.odt SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2023.03.01 11:11:56 +0530 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 307 OF 2006 Nalini Kamlakar Patil ... Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

... Respondents Ms.Aishwarya Gaikwad h/f Mr.Laxman Kanal, Advocate for Appellant. Mr.H.J.Dedhia - APP for the Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED : 27th FEBRUARY, 2023 P. C. :- 1.

Matter is listed after so many years. Learned Advocate sought time to establish the contact with the Appellant and that is why, earlier the matter was adjourned.

2.

Today, it is submitted that the letter sent by RPAD returned back with the endorsement 'left address'. Copy of letter and photo copy of returned envelope is taken on record and marked as Annexure-X. 3.

In view of this, learned Advocate is unable to establish the contact with the Appellant. In such situation, Court cannot help the Appellant. He ought to be in touch with his Advocate. No point in keeping the matter pending.

4.

Hence, matter is disposed of for want of non prosecution. (S. M. MODAK, J.)