Mr. Amit Ramesh Palav v. Mrs. Meghana Amit Palav

42.86.18-cam.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.86/2018 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.57/2018 Amit Ramesh Palav ... Applicant V/s.

Meghana A. Palav ... Respondent Mrs. Namita Maistry i/b. Nitin Gangal for the Applicant Mrs. Nilam Pawar for the Respondent

CORAM:

K.K. TATED & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATED :

APRIL 9, 2018 P.C. :

Heard. The Affidavit-in-Reply filed by the Respondent is taken on record.

The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that at present she is pressing prayer clause (b) of the Civil Application. She submits that other prayer clauses have already been complied with by the other side. It is to be noted that the Respondent has specifically stated that she is occupying the matrimonial home situated at Dahisar (E). Therefore, there is no question of letting out the said matrimonial home to third party. Hence, prayer clause (b) stands rejected. Basavraj G. Patil 1/2

42.86.18-cam.doc The Civil Application stands rejected accordingly. No order as to costs.

(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.) Basavraj G. Patil 2/2