M/S. Vitthal Traders Through Proprietor, Arun Parulekar v. Shri Santosh Pralhad Patil And ANR

p12 CA 589 OF 2016.doc vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 589 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10713 OF 2015 M/s Vitthal Traders .... Applicant.

Versus

Santosh Pralhad Patil and anr ....

Respondents Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar, for the applicant.

Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye, for the petitioner.

Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State.

CORAM : A. S. OKA & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 3rd MARCH 2016.

P.C. :

1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. The applicant is aggrieved by the communication dated 12.2.2016. The applicant will have to adopt appropriate remedy which may be available in accordance with law. We dispose of the application with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy which may be available to applicant in accordance with law.

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ A. S. OKA, J.]