Palus Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2742 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2743 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2744 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2745 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2746 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2747 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2754 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2760 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2761 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2787 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.6238 OF 2017 (No R & P in all matters) AND WRIT PETITION NO.3214 OF 2017 AND WRIT PETITION NO.3215 OF 2017 AND WRIT PETITION NO.3216 OF 2017 Sangli Uraban Co-Operative Bank Limited and Others

...Petitioners

vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Others

...Respondents

Mr. Amit Borkar, for the Petitioners Mr. C.P.Yadav, AGP for the Respondents-State 1/3

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE :

APRIL 03, 2017 (Balance Production Board Dt. 30/03/2017) P.C.:

.

Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2.

Parties through their counsel.

3.

We find that against the impugned order the Petitioners have already filed the Revision before the Revisional Authority. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submit that the Revisional Authority is not hearing the stay applications and in the circumstances, the Petitioners have to approach this Court. 4.

The learned AGP submits that the Revisional Authority shall decide the Petitioners' applications for stay filed in the Revisions as also the Revisions as expeditiously as possible. 5.

Recording the statement made by the learned AGP, we dispose of the Writ Petitions by directing the Petitioners to appear before the Revisional Authority on 10th April, 2017 at 3.00 p.m. 6.

The Revisional Authority on that date shall hear the 2/3

Petitioners and pass appropriate order on the Petitioners' Applications for stay or decide the Revisions finally. Let this be done as expeditiously as possible but not later than three weeks from the date of appearance of the Petitioners before the Revisional Authority.

7.

With the aforesaid direction, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of.

(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) 3/3