Smt. Asha Suresh Yadav And ANR. v. Thane Municipal Corporation And ORS.

(58)-WP-2731-15 & group.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2731 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1099 OF 2015 Smt. Asha Suresh Yadav and another ..Petitioners/Applicants

Versus

Thane Municipal Corporation, Thane and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6478 OF 2015 Sadashiv Mahipati Gaikwad ..Petitioner

Versus

Thane Municipal Corporation, Thane and others ..Respondents Mr. S. G. Kudle, Advocate for the Petitioners in both Writ Petitions & for Applicants in Civil Application.

Mr. S. S. Panchpor, AGP for Respondent No.3 in both Writ Petitions. Mr. S. P. Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.6 in both Writ Petitions.

Mr. Vinayak Kumbhar I/by Mr. S A. Mane, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 & 5.

Mr. M. V. Limaye, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 in both Writ Petitions.

CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE : 11th MARCH, 2019 P.C.

1] Mr. M. V. Limaye, learned counsel appearing on behalf BGP. 1 of 2

(58)-WP-2731-15 & group.doc.

of Respondent Nos.1 and 2 makes a categorical statement that the Petitioners are already absorbed in the service. Mr. M. V. Limaye, further states that on account of absorption of the Petitioners, they may have lost their interest to prosecute the Petition and therefore they might not have contacted learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2] We record the statement of Mr. M. V. Limaye, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 & 2. As such, the Writ Petitions as well as Civil Application stand disposed of. [SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] BGP. 2 of 2