Bvg India Limited Thr. Its Mr. Pratik Laxmikant Muley v. Raigad Hospital And Research Centre Of Ttasgaonkar Group Mrs. Vandana N. Tasgaonkar And Oithers

908-arp-65-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 65 OF 2022 BVG India Limited through its Mr. Pratik Laxmikant Muley

...Petitioner

Vs.

Raigad Hospital and Research Centre of Tasgaonkar Group Mrs. Vandana N. Tasgaonkar and Ors.

...Respondents

---- Mr. Sandeep S. Ladda a/w. Mr. Adesh Jadhav a/w. Mr. Sarvesh Dixit, for the Petitioner.

Mr. M. R. Sherekar a/w. Mr. Akshay Kapadia, for the Respondent. ---- Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2023.04.15 11:25:09 +0530 CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : 13 APRIL 2023 MAMTA AMAR KALE P.C.

.

This petition was filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of an arbitrator. But, in the meanwhile, the parties have settled their disputes. 2.

The learned counsel for the parties have handed over the Settlement Deed signed by the authorised representatives of the parties and their respective Advocates. The Settlement Deed consists of the terms on which the disputes have been settled between the parties.

Mamta Kale

908-arp-65-2022.doc 3.

The Settlement Deed is taken on record and marked 'X'. 4.

The undertakings given in the Settlement Deed are treated as undertaking to this Court. The parties are directed to abide by their respective obligations contained in the Settlement Deed. 5.

As per clause (G) of the Settlement Deed, the parties have agreed that the Settlement Deed is to be treated as a decree of the Court. Accordingly, the Settlement Deed shall be treated as a decree.

6.

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. MANISH PITALE, J.

Mamta Kale