← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/454/2019allowed

Esak Ismail Shaikh v. Madhav Keshavrao Jagtap And ORS.

2019-02-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai2 pages

(6)-CAW-438-19 & group.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.438 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2172 OF 2015 Pune Mahanagarpalika Kamgar Union ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Pune Mahanagarpalika Kamgar Union and others ..Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2172 OF 2015 Pune Mahanagarpalika Kamgar Union and others ..Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.454 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2285 OF 2016 Esak Ismail Shaikh ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Madhav Keshavrao Jagtap and others ..Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2285 OF 2016 BGP. 1 of 2

(6)-CAW-438-19 & group.doc.

Madhav Keshavrao Jagtap and others ..Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Mr. Sushil Mahadeshwar I/by Ranjana Todankar & Anita Y. Murgude, Advocate for the Applicants in both the Civil Applications. Mr. Y. S. Khochare, AGP for Respondent No.1 in both the Civil Applications.

Mr. Anand R. Nandu h/f Mr. A. P. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 in both the Civil Applications. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2019 P.C.

1] Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Accordingly, Civil Applications are disposed of.

2] In the event, Respondents desire to file any consequential reply so as to meet the averments brought on record by way of amendment, the same shall be done within a period of two weeks thereafter. Stand over to 20th March 2019. 3] Until further order, the position as was recorded in the order dated 31st March 2015 shall continue to operate. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] BGP. 2 of 2