Vinod Parasharam Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

osk 910-aba-470-2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 470 OF 2019 Vinod Parasharam Jadhav ...

Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents • Ms.Khushboo R. Shah for the Applicant.

• Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent-State. • Mr.Yogesh Kale, PSI, Powai Police Station.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE : 22nd FEBRUARY, 2019.

P.C. :

1] This is an application for anticipatory bail. The earlier application was decided vide order dated 19th December, 2018. The said order indicates that after hearing for some time, when the Court was not inclined to grant relief, the application was withdrawn. 2] Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the application for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court was rejected on the ground that the recovery is to be made. It is submitted that the co-accused was arrested and he has been granted bail vide order dated 11th January, 2019, by the Sessions Court and from the said order it is apparent that the amount involved in the crime was recovered at the 1/2

osk 910-aba-470-2019.odt instance of the other accused. It is, therefore, prayed that the grant of bail to the co-accused and the observations made therein is the change in circumstances to consider this application for anticipatory bail, as nothing is to be recovered from the Applicant. The earlier application was withdrawn when this Court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail.

3] In these circumstances, this application cannot be entertained and hence, the same is rejected.

[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.] 2/2