← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/1090/2016allowed to be withdrawn

Suresh Devappa Aawti v. Salan Nazir Shaikh And ORS.

2016-04-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1090 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3376 OF 2016 Suresh Devappa Aawti .. Applicant

Versus

Salan Nazir Shaikh and others .. Respondents ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1091 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3382 OF 2016 Suresh Devappa Aawti .. Applicant

Versus

Aaba Bapu Patil and others .. Respondents Mr. M. L. Patil, for the Applicant.

Mr. Pratap Patil, for the Respondent No.1 in Civil Application No.1090 of 2016.

Mr. D. S. Patil for the Respondent No.1 in Civil Application No.1091 of 2016.

Ms. D. S. Mondkar-Ghule i/by Mr. S. B. Shetye, for the Respondent No.6.

CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J.

DATE : 29th APRIL 2016 P.C.

1.

The above Civil Applications have been filed seeking stay of the impugned order dated 22.02.2016 passed by the Learned 2nd Joint

Civil Judge Senior Division, Sangli. The above Petitions are pending admission. In the above Petitions, notice came to be issued on 18.03.2016 and as and by way of interim relief. The following directions were issued. "In my view, it would be appropriate to continue the stay of the order however the same would be on the condition that the Petitioner would not participate in the proceedings of the Municipal Corporation or draw allowances until further orders of this Court."

It seems that the said directions are being construed in a manner that the Petitioners in the above Petitions are not entitled to even attend the meetings of the Corporation or the meetings of the committees of the Corporation of which they are members. It is clarified that the said directions would mean that the Petitioners are entitled to attend the meetings, but would not be entitled to vote in the meetings of the Corporation or of any committee of which they are the members and would also not draw allowances. It is further clarified that the Petitioners would be entitled to participate in the discussion. The clarification as above would operate in the main Petition itself. In view of the aforesaid clarification, the Learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks withdrawal of the above Civil Applications. The Civil Applications are accordingly allowed to be withdrawn. List the above Petitions for admission on 20.06.2016.

2.

Parties to act upon a copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Shirestedar.

[R.M. SAVANT, J]