Mahacontainers Pvt.Ltd. v. Mahadeo Kashinath Mhetre
Chittewan 1/2
224. WP 9271-03.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9271 OF 2003 Mahacontainers Pvt. Ltd.
....
Petitioner
Versus
Mahadeo Kashinath Mhetre ....
Respondent ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.9272 OF 2003 Mahacontainers Pvt. Ltd.
....
Petitioner
Versus
Shri Adhikrao Rajaram Patil ....
Respondent ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.9318 OF 2003 Mahacontainers Pvt. Ltd.
....
Petitioner
Versus
Shri Sambhaji Maruti Pujari ....
Respondent ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.9320 OF 2003 Mahacontainers Pvt. Ltd.
....
Petitioner
Versus
Shri Deepak Shamrao Patil ....
Respondent ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.9321 OF 2003 Mahacontainers Pvt. Ltd.
....
Petitioner
Versus
Shri Dilip Ramkrishna Bhatalchande ....
Respondent .....
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Seema Sarnaik for the Respondents.
....
Chittewan 2/2
224. WP 9271-03.doc CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.
DATE : 19 JULY 2018 P. C. :
.
None for the Petitioner. Considering the fact that learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner earlier was elevated to the bench, a court notice by way of personal service on the Petitioner was ordered. Notice had been duly served according to office remark. None, however, appeared for the Petitioner. The matter had thereafter appeared on a couple of dates when none appeared for the Petitioner. In the premises, all petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C. GUPTE, J.) Rajesh Vasant Chittewan by Rajesh Vasant Chittewan Date: 2018.07.23 15:26:04 +0530