← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/390/2016anticipatory bail rejected

Suresh Vishram Puralkar And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

2016-11-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

3-ABA-390-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.390 OF 2016 Mr. Suresh Vishram Puralkar & Anr.

...

Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent .....

Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. N.B.Patil, APP for the Respondent/State.

....

CORAM :

N.W.SAMBRE, J.

DATED :

24th NOVEMBER, 2016.

P.C.

The applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail in Crime No.293 of 2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471,474, 420, 120B read with Section 34 of IPC.

The applicants are secretary and cashier of a trust from where a substantial amount of Rs.60 Lakhs was transferred. There was no legal necessity to transfer the said amount and that too in an account which was never opened and operated by the proprietor of S.K.Enterprises, Mr. Satyen Appa Kesarkar as is reflected in investigation papers.

The offence is economic one which is required to be viewed seriously and vividly. While the offence prima-facie shows involvement of the applicants, no case is made out for anticipatory bail. Application , Shivgan 1/2

3-ABA-390-2016 accordingly, stands rejected.

Ad-interim protection to continue for a period of three weeks from today.

(N.W.SAMBRE, J.) Shivgan 2/2