Mangesh Suresh Bhise v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sherla V.

wp.912.2016+_9.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.912 OF 2016 Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1177 OF 2016 Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1189 OF 2016 Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mrs.Nasreen S.K. Ayubi, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner Mr.H.J. Dedia, APP, for Respondent - State CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE: JULY 18, 2016 ORAL ORDER (PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.):

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3.

The prayer of the petitioner in these petitions is that he be released on parole / furlough. The learned APP has produced a letter of the 1 / 2

wp.912.2016+_9.doc Superintendent of Nashik Road Central Prison. The said letter is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The letter states that the petitioner has completed his period of imprisonment and he has been released from the prison.

4.

In this view of the matter, all the three petitions have become infructuous. Hence, Rule is discharged.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) 2 / 2