Sampat Shripati Mulik v. Ramesh Nivruti Nikam And ANR

1-APPEAL-236-2013.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.236 OF 2013 SAMPAT SHRIPATI MULIK )...APPELLANT V/s.

RAMESH NIVRUTI NIKAM AND ANR.

)...RESPONDENTS Mr.Kunal Amburkar i/b. Mr.Niranjan Mundargi, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE :

3rd MARCH 2017.

P.C. :

It is seen from office noting that respondent no.1 could not be served because of non-submission of his correct address for service. The appellant to furnish fresh and correct address of respondent no.1 for effecting service of notice on him, within a period of two weeks from today. If fresh and correct address is not supplied within this prescribed period, his appeal shall stand dismissed qua unserved respondent no.1. If fresh and correct address is furnished within the prescribed time, then issue notice to respondent no.1, returnable after 8 weeks. (A. M. BADAR, J.) avk 1/1