Sou.Seema Niranjan Karmalkar @ Seema Rahul Sutrave v. Mr.Rahul Dnyaneshwar Sutrave And ANR.

1 / 2 10-CAM-90-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 90 OF 2018 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 6234 OF 2018 Sou.Seema Niranjan Karmalkar @ Seema Rahul Sutrave ...Applicant

Versus

Mr.Rahul Dnyaneshwar Sutrave And Anr.

...Respondents

....

.......

• Ms. Yogita Kuveskar i/b. Priyal G. Sarda, Advocate for Applicant.

• Mr. Rupesh Gadekar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : K. K. TATED & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 08th NOVEMBER, 2019.

P.C. :

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. By this Civil Application, the Applicant/Wife is seeking condonation of 57 days delay in filing Appeal challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 31/08/2017 passed by Family Nesarikar

2 / 2 10-CAM-90-18.odt Court, Pune, in P.A.No.318/14 allowing the Respondent No.1's Petition for nullity u/s 11(5)(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

3. Considering the submissions made by learned Counsel for the Applicant and averments made in application, we are satisfied that the Applicant has made out a case for allowing this Civil Application. Hence, the following order is passed :

ORDER

(a) Delay in filing the Family Court Appeal is condoned.

(b) Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (c) No order as to costs.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)