← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/195/2019disposed off

The State Of Maharashtra Through School Education And Sports Dept. And ANR. v. Ms. Priyanka Balasaheb Nikam And ORS.

2022-09-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,Hon'Ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh2 pages

rsk 1 915-RPW-ST-5833-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO.5833 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13870 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.195 OF 2019 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO.5833 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra through School Education and Sports Department & Anr.

... Petitioners Vs.

Ms. Priyanka Balasaheb Nikam and Ors.

...Respondents

-------.

Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for the Petitioner-State. Mr. Prashant S. Bhavake for Respondent No.1-Original Petitioner -------

CORAM

:

NITIN JAMDAR & SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED :

23 SEPTEMBER 2022.

P. C. :

This Petition seeks review of the order dated 19 October 2018 in Writ Petition No.13870 of 2018 passed by the Division by RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE Date:

2022.10.03 18:13:09 +0530 RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE Bench(Coram: B. R. Gavai & M. S. Karnik, JJ.) of this Court. 2.

The learned counsel for the Respondent states that the

rsk 2 915-RPW-ST-5833-19.doc impugned order is already implemented by the State, approval is granted and even salary has been paid. Even otherwise, we find that the order under review follows the earlier judgment in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 dated 10 July 2017. Nothing is placed before us as to whether the judgment and order dated 10 July 2017 was challenged and the challenge was successful and orders were set aside. 3.

Since the order under review does not lay down any new position of law and that the said order has already been implemented, we find no reason to exercise review jurisdiction. In view of the same, no purpose will be served by condoning the delay. 4.

Both the Review Petition and the Interim application are disposed of.

(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)