Pandharinath Sakharam Raut And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.
wp2710.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2710 OF 2017 1] Pandharinath Sakharam Raut ] Adult, Indian Inhabitant ] Occupation : Farmer ] R/o. At Post Village Rautwadi ] Taluka Shirur, District Pune ] ] 2] Sunil Ganpat Bhumkar ] Adult, Indian Inhabitant ] Occupation : Farmer ] R/o. At Post Village Rautwadi ] Taluka Shirur, District Pune ]..... Petitioners.
Versus
1] State of Maharashtra ] Through the Secretary, ] Ministry of Cooperation, Irrigation ] & Textile, Government of Maharashtra ] Mantralaya, Mumbai400 032 ] ] 2] Minister for Cooperation, Irrigation ] & Textile, Government of Maharashtra ] Mantralaya, Mumbai400 032 ] ] 3] Regional Joint Director, ] Cooperative Societies, Pune Division ] Pune ] ] 4] District Deputy Registrar, ] Cooperative Societies, Pune Rural ] 5] Assistant Registrar ] Cooperative Societies, Shirur, Pune ] (Respondent Nos.1 to 5 to be served ] through Government Pleader (Writ Cell),] Mumbai ] ] 6] Ajinkyatara Vividh Karyakari ] Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, ] Rautwadi (Proposed Society) ] lgc
wp2710.17 Through its Chief Promoter, ] Shri. Dilip Baburao Kothawale ] Adult Indian Inhabitant, Occ : Farmer ] At Post Rautwadi, ] Taluka Shirur, Dist. Pune412 211 ]..... Respondents.
Shri P S Dani, Senior Advocate i/by Shri Sagar Amrut Rane for the Petitioners Shri. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Shri. A. B. Vagyani, Government Pleader a/w Mrs. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for State/Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Shri. S. K. Shinde a/w Shri. P. H. Gaikwad for Respondent No.6. CORAM :
R. M. SAVANT, J.
Reserved on :
3rd March 2017 Pronounced on : 22nd March 2017 ORAL ORDER :
Rule.
The above Writ Petition is companion to Writ Petition No.1164 of 2017.
In view of the Judgment bearing today's date i.e. 22/03/2017 rendered in the said Writ Petition No.1164 of 2017, and for the reasons stated therein, the above Writ Petition is allowed and the directions as contained in paragraph No.27 of the said Judgment would equally apply to the instant case. The registration of the Society in question as directed by the impugned order would accordingly stand set aside. Rule is accordingly made absolute with parties to bear their respective costs.
[R.M.SAVANT, J] lgc