Krushnaji Kantilal Nagawade And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

wp-2713.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2713 OF 2017 1] Krushnaji Kantilal Nagawade ] Adult, Indian Inhabitant ] Occupation : Farmer ] R/o. At Post Village Babhulsar-Budruk ] Taluka Shirur, District Pune ] ] 2] Santosh Narayan Nagawade ] Adult, Indian Inhabitant ] Occupation : Farmer ] R/o. At Post Village Babhulsar-Budruk ] Taluka Shirur, District Pune ]..... Petitioners.

Versus

1] State of Maharashtra ] Through the Secretary, ] Ministry of Co-operation, Irrigation ] & Textile, Government of Maharashtra ] Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032 ] ] 2] Minister for Co-operation, Irrigation ] & Textile, Government of Maharashtra ] Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032 ] ] 3] Regional Joint Director, ] Co-operative Societies, Pune Division ] Pune ] ] 4] District Deputy Registrar, ] Co-operative Societies, Pune Rural ] 5] Assistant Registrar ] Co-operative Societies, Shirur, Pune ] (Respondent Nos.1 to 5 to be served ] through Government Pleader (Writ Cell),] Mumbai ] ] 6] Shri. Bhairavnath Vividh Karyakari ] Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, ] Babhulsar-Budruk (Proposed Society) ] lgc

wp-2713.17 Through its Chief Promoter, ] Shri. Ankush Motiram Nagwade ] Adult Indian Inhabitant, Occ : Farmer ] At Post Babhulsar-Budruk, ] Taluka Shirur, Dist. Pune-412 211 ]..... Respondents.

Shri P S Dani, Senior Advocate i/by Shri Sagar Amrut Rane for the Petitioners Shri. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Shri. A. B. Vagyani, Government Pleader a/w Mrs. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for State/Respondent Nos.1 to 5 Shri. S. K. Shinde a/w Shri. P. H. Gaikwad for Respondent No.6. CORAM :

R. M. SAVANT, J.

Reserved on :

3rd March 2017 Pronounced on : 22nd March 2017 ORAL ORDER :

Rule.

The above Writ Petition is companion to Writ Petition No.1164 of 2017.

In view of the Judgment bearing today's date i.e. 22/03/2017 rendered in the said Writ Petition No.1164 of 2017, and for the reasons stated therein, the above Writ Petition is allowed and the directions as contained in paragraph No.27 of the said Judgment would equally apply to the instant case. The registration of the Society in question as directed by the impugned order would accordingly stand set aside. Rule is accordingly made absolute with parties to bear their respective costs.

[R.M.SAVANT, J] lgc