Chandrakant Nanasaheb Kadam v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

- 1 - (CRPILSt 9 of 2017) vat

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION(ST) No. 9 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST) No. 12 OF 2017 Chandrakant Nanasaheb Kadam

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

*********** Mr. Sachin Bharat Thorat for the Petitioner Mrs. S.V. Sonawane -APP for the State Ms. Manisha Jagtap for Respondent No.3 *********** CORAM : V.M. KANADE & C.V. BHADANG, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 30, 2017 P.C. :

1.

By these petitions / PILs, which are filed under section 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is seeking an appropriate writ, order and direction, directing Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith register an offence against Respondent Nos.4 to 9 and investigate the same in accordance with law and take necessary action in accordance with law.

1/2

- 2 - (CRPILSt 9 of 2017) 2.

In our view, the Petitioner has an alternate remedy of filing a complaint before the concerned authority and therefore, we are not inclined to entertain this PILs / petitions. Reserving a right of the Petitioner to exhaust an alternate remedy to file a complaint before the concerned authority, both the PILs / petitions are disposed of.

[C.V. BHADANG, J.] [ V.M. KANADE, J.] Vaishali Tikan 2/2