Mohini Parag Pandharipande v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

4.ABA-629-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.629 OF 2021 Mohini Parag Pandharipande .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ....

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.993 OF 2021 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.629 OF 2021 Varsha C. Sankholkar ....Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Mohini Parag Pandharipande .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Ms. Lakshmi Raman, Advocate for the Applicant in ABA/629/2021.

Smt. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Rohit Pawaskar, Advocate for the Applicant/Intervenor in IA/993/2021.

______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 28th JULY, 2021 [Through Video Conferencing] P.C. :

1.

Both learned counsel i.e. learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the intervenor make a joint statement that the FIR, which is subject matter of this Deshmane (PS)

: 2 :

4.ABA-629-21.odt application, is quashed by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.7.2021 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No.1102/2021 on 16.7.2021. Both learned counsel jointly submitted that Anticipatory Bail Application No.629/2021, therefore, has become infructuous and the intervention application i.e. Interim Application No.993/2021 does not survive.

2.

Considering these submissions, both these applications are disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane (PS)